The desire to find technological
solutions for law enforcement issues is an endless topic of fascination for
me. I found this
interesting example the other day whilst perusing twitter. Norfolk County Council plan to use a ‘Mobile
Phone Detection System’ which will detect whether a vehicle has a mobile
telephone in it that is currently being operated and will signal a sign to
light up.
Yes you read that right that is
the extent of the technological development, it will detect whether a vehicle has
an active mobile phone in it. It won’t
detect whether the driver is using the mobile phone, it could be the
passenger.
It doesn't say in the report how
or what triggers the sensor, whether it is use of the mobile phone for calls
and texts or whether data usage also triggers the device. Presumably it will detect data use otherwise
it seems outdated since use of facebook, twitter or whatsapp may not
trigger the device unless data use was also detected. This would be a clear problem for the device since such use is more common than actually talking on the phone behind the wheel. If it does detect
data use then presumably it will also detect back ground data usage on running
apps or service updates. Furthermore it
doesn't make clear whether the data use has to be outgoing or in-going, for
example will receiving a call or text set off the device regardless of whether
answered or not?
Hopefully these questions were
asked by the council before committing to purchase. What is clear from the report is that the
council and police force are completely unconcerned about false positives:
(e.g. receiving a call and not answering, or passenger using a phone).
‘The system
can't detect whether it’s a passenger using a phone in a vehicle or whether a
hands-free device is being used. But of course, those people don't need to be
worried if they get a flash from the sign’
One has to ask what on earth is
being signaled by the second sentence in this quote, worried about what? Clearly
it’s not an enforcement tool so there is no danger of official action here, all
that happens is a no mobile use sign will be displayed.
According to the head of Norfolk
and Suffolk Roads Policing Unit:
Driving while
using a mobile phone is dangerous because it distracts your attention from the
road.
Quite how a flashing illuminated
sign helps refocus is not quite clear, I could see how the sign could quite
easily distract a driver particularly when it gives a false positive (flashing
sign but no mobile phone use, e.g. an incoming call or passenger call). Here it seems it would be quite distracting
to have to wonder why I have been given a signal when I am not using my phone. If it detects data use as well then the possibility for more confusion arises as we wonder why on earth the sign has been illuminated.
It’s also worth thinking about
who this sign is ultimately aimed at, it seems it is aimed at those drivers who
use their mobile phone and are unaware that it is an offence to do so. Now to me that seems a very small (very very
small) number of drivers. Those who use
their phone whilst driving regardless of the law are unlikely to be affected.
I should point out that I am not
against similar signs that highlight the speed limit (I believe it is a similar
company to the most common illuminated speed sign company). With speed limit enforcement the law is not
fixed, it is variable depending upon the portion of the road you are travelling
on, so a timely reminder of the speed limit could act to help slow us down to
the appropriate limit. Mobile phone use
is completely different it is a complete offence regardless of the road you are
on (public).
It reminds me somewhat of the don’t
drink and drive signs on the motorway, of course no-one should and those that
need telling are unlikely to respond to a road side sign. Now with drink driving again there is an
element of public ignorance about how the body processes alcohol and so there
is an educational message to be made about morning after (even afternoon after)
sobriety. But with mobile phone use I
can’t see the issue.
So I’m left with the feeling that
at this point without more knowledge about the actual workings of the system it
all seems like a bit of a waste gimmick. I’d love to know the cost of the system. It seems designed as a system to target those who won’t care or don’t
care and may cause more distraction than it is worth.
I completely agree with you that more awareness must be spread among people who that they don’t use mobile while driving. My Dad used to work with a Los Angeles DUI lawyer and he tells how every year number of fatalities and crashes due to distraction by mobile keeps on increasing.
ReplyDeleteYes! it's true.. thanks..
ReplyDeleteParking Management
Great information.. thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteWe offer best parking services!!
We offer best parking Equipment's
Thank you!!